I felt very low last night. I retired early to my bedroom where I picked up a volume of Dogen's writings that Thomas Cleary translated.
Dogen was the Japanese monk who brought Chan Buddhism from China; in Japan it's known as Zen Buddhism. He had one of the most philosophically profound minds in Buddhist history and his writings are pellucid examples of Buddhist thought. When I first started sitting zazen twenty years ago I happened on a text Dogen wrote for a lay student in 1233. It's called Genjokoan (The Issue at Hand), and it's part of Dogen's masterwork Shobogenzo (Treasury of the Eye of True Teaching). I revisit this essay when I need my thinking realigned. Last night was another powerful encounter with a most profound teacher.
I finally unpacked a phrase in the essay that had been a sticking point for me:
There is ceasing the traces of enlightenment, which causes one to forever leave the traces of enlightenment which is cessation.
I reflected on this after having heard Huber's discussion on the renunciate life. Dogen puts his finger on the pulse right here. Cessation - renunciation - is the cause of the first traces of enlightenment. As Dogen says, Studying the Buddha Way is studying oneself. Studying oneself is forgetting oneself. I doubt if anyone can make progress on any mystical path without the discipline of cessation. But there is yet more to realize. Cessation - renunciation of the world - is not enough; it cannot be the end of the path. Dogen says that there is ceasing the traces of enlightenment - the focus on cessation - as one steps away from it forever. But what is this realization?
Dogen opens Genjokoan with a masterful analysis of Buddhism. Cleary's introductory essay points out that Dogen introduces Genjokoan with one of the standard presentations of Chan Buddhist thought, the "five ranks" device. The very core is that there is complete interpenetration of the absolute and the relative. There is nothing to seek because all is revealed at once, in each instant. Contrast this opening statement:
When all things are Buddha-teachings, then there is delusion and enlightenment, there is cultivation of practice, there is birth, there is death, there are Buddhas, there are sentient beings.
with the second:
When myriad things are all not self, there is no delusion, no enlightenment, no Buddhas, no sentient beings, no birth, no death.
The first statement unfolds the various relative aspects of reality within the totality of the absolute. All things, both all delusions and all enlightenment, are contained within the absolute: when all things are Buddha-teachings. The second statement reveals the surprising converse: that within each of the myriad things rests the absolute. So realization is that all phases and fragments of the world unfold within the singular nature of the absolute, and simultaneously the complete absolute nature of reality rests in each evanescent thing whose existence depends on a myriad of other factors. Relative in absolute, absolute in relative.
Here, to my untutored mind, is the underlying unity between Zen and Tibetan Buddhism. Both state that true realization occurs simultaneously in the absolute and the relative viewpoints. Neither is true by itself. Only in the equipoise between this vast polarity can realization truly manifest.
